China Beauty Is Growing. So Why Are the Giants Leaving?

Seven international beauty brands left China since January. Chinese cosmetics sales grew for seven straight months. Why both are true, and what it opens up.

China Beauty Is Growing. So Why Are the Giants Leaving?

Seven international beauty brands left China since January. Chinese cosmetics sales grew for seven straight months. Why both are true, and what it opens up.

China Beauty Is Growing. So Why Are the Giants Leaving?

Since January, seven international beauty brands have cut channels or walked out of China entirely.

Filorga, owned by Colgate-Palmolive, off Tmall in January. Etude House paused its Tmall store the same month. Hince, owned by LG H&H, paused its Tmall overseas flagship. Yakult pulled skincare out of cross-border e-commerce. Shihyo, a L'Oréal luxury launch, shut its China online shops. Tatcha, owned by Unilever, closed its Tmall shop in April. And on Aug 19, IT Cosmetics announced it was leaving the country altogether.

Not one indie in the group. Every name sits inside a global conglomerate: L'Oréal, LG, Amorepacific, Colgate, Unilever.

Over roughly the same stretch, Chinese cosmetics sales grew faster than Chinese retail overall. Seven months running. The IT Cosmetics exit was reported on the same morning as that statistic.

A category is growing. Its biggest players are walking out of it. Both true at once, and the gap between them is where your opportunity sits.

The clearest picture of it is a shop floor in Beijing

Wangfujing APM, ground floor. Lancôme had 320 square metres there, opened October 2020 with National Day fanfare, the brand's second flagship anywhere in the world after the Champs-Élysées and its largest store in China.

The lease ran out before the store turned six. The logo came off the wall on July 30.

The hoardings that went up belong to Salomon.

Beijing Business Today headlined the story 占位逻辑失效. The trophy-position logic has failed. Five characters worth pinning above your desk.

They aren't losing money. They're failing a test

Here's the distinction most coverage misses, and it's the one that matters to you.

L'Oréal didn't shut IT Cosmetics in China because Chinese women stopped buying cosmetics. It shut because IT Cosmetics couldn't clear the return L'Oréal Luxe requires from a brand occupying its China resources. Those are different problems with different solutions, and only one of them says anything about the market.

Inside a group like that, your China business isn't judged against zero. It's judged against Lancôme, against Kiehl's, against what the same capital would earn if it went to L'Oréal Paris instead. A brand can be profitable in China and still get killed for being the least profitable thing in the division. The decision gets made in Paris, on a spreadsheet, by people comparing you to your own stablemates.

Watch where the freed-up money goes and the logic is obvious. L'Oréal Paris, Maybelline and Kiehl's keep getting fed. Lancôme gets consolidated rather than cut, and on Aug 18 the group folded seven Hong Kong direct-to-consumer sites into Tmall, taking in YSL, Armani, Aesop, Kiehl's, Shu Uemura and Helena Rubinstein along with it. Meanwhile €400M is going into bringing Gucci Beauty in-house by 2027. Nobody there is running for the exit. They're cutting the brands that don't clear the bar and spending the money on the ones that do, in the same market, in the same quarter.

Lancôme, worth noting, still trades from 18 counters in Beijing and finished 618 in the top four on Tmall beauty. It gave up the monument and kept the business.

Where the money went

Amer Sports reported Q2 revenue up 32%, driven by Greater China, in the same week as the IT Cosmetics news. Amer Sports owns Salomon. Salomon is the brand papering over Lancôme's old windows in Wangfujing.

The money didn't leave China. It walked thirty metres down the corridor and bought trail shoes.

Same floor, same mall, same city, same woman with the same wallet, spending it on a different occasion.

What to do about it

If you're independent, this is the opening. A conglomerate brand has to beat its stablemates for capital every year. You don't. You can accept a China business returning 12% for four years while it compounds. L'Oréal Luxe structurally cannot, which is why IT Cosmetics is gone and why counters, shelf positions, mall relationships and KOL rosters are coming free right now across prestige beauty. The people vacating them are leaving for reasons that have nothing to do with whether the space can make money. Go and price what they're giving up, because it's being valued by a seller who has already decided not to want it.

Stop buying monuments. Six years, 320 square metres, a National Day launch, and what survived was 18 counters and a Tmall store. Before you sign a landmark lease in China, write down what it does that a counter, a Tmall flagship and a Douyin room can't. If the honest answer is that it makes your board feel serious about China, don't sign it.

Your heritage stopped being a moat. Chinese domestic brands took share by competing on formulation and price, in public, with ingredient lists. A French address and a founding date used to close the sale on their own. They now buy you a hearing, and she reads the INCI list anyway. If your product can't survive a Xiaohongshu ingredient teardown, your brand story won't rescue it.

If you are owned, go and find your number. Two numbers, in fact. What your China business actually contributes after distributor take, KOL fees, live-commerce commission, Tmall operating cost and shelf cost per SKU. And what return your group requires from a China brand before it stops asking questions. Somebody in head office already knows both. If you don't, you'll find out the way IT Cosmetics did.

Others Articles

Others Articles